Thursday, 29 May 2014

Income Statement Analysis - APOLLO vs LONBISC

Table 1 and Table 2 in appendix presented the horizontal common size analysis of APOLLO and LONBISC respectively. It express the income statements in each year as a percentage of given base year (year 2009). Horizontal analysis on income statement help us to identify the trend of revenue, expenses and incomes from the previous year’s compared to the base year of 2009. 

We see that the APOLLO's revenue grew by 27% from 2009 to 2013 (CAGR of 6%).  And, the cost of sale grew at slight lower rate (21%) resulting in higher growth in gross profit (45%).  The more important operating profit and net profit grew at a higher rate of 66% and 53% respectively.  The profit growth is in tandem with revenue growth and the quality of growth is hence considered good.

LONBISC's revenue growth in a faster rate of 57% (CAGR 12%). This revnue growth is much more better than APOLLO. Isn’t LONBISC an ideal growth company to invest in? Not until after you have investigated the quality of its growth.

LONBISC's cost of sales increases at 72% and this is much higher than the revenue growth rate (57%) and this results a lower gross profit growth (18%). And, this further contribute to the lower growth of the operating profit and net profit. This prove that  the quality of its growth for LONBISC is very poor.

Table 3 and Table 4 in appendix presented the vertical common size analysis which let us see how the revenues and the spending on different types of expenses change from one year to the next for each company, and compare the two companies of different revenues.

The vertical analaysis on Income statement on APOLLO show us that the profit margin (gross, operating, and net) is on a steady up trend. And, the management’s ability to contain the total operating expenses to about 10% each year.  The growth in profit margin is in tandem with the revenue growth. On the latest financial year, the gross profit margin, operating profit margin and net profit margin is 28%,  19% and 14% respectively.  The good result here give us more confident on APPOLO's growth quality.

In comparison, LONBISC has a much lower gross, operating and net profit margin of just 20%, 10% and 5% in 2013. The more worrisome part is these margins was in down trend and have been deteriorating every year since 7 years ago. It is clear from the vertical analysis that the culprit is the unabated increasing cost of sales which has increased from 64% of sales from 2006, to 79% in 2013, whereas operating costs have not improved much despite the high growth in revenue as shown in Table 4 in the Appendix. 
Comparison between APOLLO and LONBISC, the total operating costs as a percentage of sales of LONBISC is generally 50% higher than that of APOLLO (15% vs 10%). The heavy financing cost of LONBISC (4%) worsens the net profit margin compared to the debt free status of company APOLLO . These explain the much better financial performance of company APOLLO in comparison with LONBISC.
Based on the analyst result, it clear show that chasing high growth is not necessary a good investing strategy, but searching for quality growth is. High growth unaccompanied by profit growth often could be a bogus growth.

Appendix:-


Year
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009

CAGR
Revenue
127.04%
114.38%
100.54%
90.99%
100.00%

6%
Cost of sales and services
121.13%
117.60%
102.91%
86.26%
100.00%

5%
Gross profit
145.14%
104.52%
93.31%
105.45%
100.00%

10%
Other operating income
119.78%
129.03%
100.13%
283.82%
100.00%

5%
Administrative expenses
121.80%
109.87%
113.08%
107.91%
100.00%

5%
Selling and distribution
113.71%
103.85%
76.69%
82.66%
100.00%

3%
Other operating expenses
79.62%
0.00%
129.33%
112.83%
100.00%

-6%
Profit from operation, EBIT
166.85%
112.39%
88.74%
126.75%
100.00%

14%
Finance costs
-
-
-
-
-

-
Share of profit from associate co.
-
-
-
-
-

-
EBT
166.85%
112.39%
88.74%
126.75%
100.00%

14%
Taxation
229.13%
151.46%
104.40%
167.35%
100.00%

23%
Net Income
153.38%
103.93%
85.36%
117.97%
100.00%

11%








Attributed to:







Equity holders of the company
153.38%
103.93%
85.36%
117.97%
100.00%

11%
Minority interest
-
-
-
-
-

-

Table 1: Horizontal Analysis of APOLLO


Year
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009

CAGR
Revenue
157.34%
137.56%
126.28%
121.23%
100.00%

12%
Cost of sales and services
172.04%
146.04%
131.03%
126.55%
100.00%

15%
Gross profit
118.42%
115.11%
113.71%
107.16%
100.00%

4%
Other operating income
385.86%
202.20%
180.42%
89.53%
100.00%

40%
Administrative expenses
157.50%
96.42%
101.23%
100.29%
100.00%

12%
Selling and distribution
138.50%
147.39%
125.82%
129.15%
100.00%

8%
Other operating expenses
-
-
-
-
-

-
Profit from operation, EBIT
122.01%
112.73%
119.60%
93.06%
100.00%

5%
Finance costs
115.95%
136.95%
124.53%
77.77%
100.00%

4%
Share of profit from associate co.
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
78.21%
100.00%

-100%
EBT
106.68%
80.73%
98.08%
99.90%
100.00%

2%
Taxation
755.60%
92.67%
238.09%
-95.93%
100.00%

66%
Net Income
88.07%
80.39%
94.06%
105.52%
100.00%

-3%








Attributed to:







Equity holders of the company
77.14%
69.22%
76.88%
94.20%
100.00%

-6%
Minority interest
248.17%
244.06%
345.70%
271.39%
100.00%

26%
 Table 2: Horizontal Analysis of LONBISC


Year
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Revenue
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
Cost of sales and services
-71.89%
-77.52%
-77.17%
-71.48%
-75.39%
-76.20%
-70.41%
-69.95%
Gross profit
28.11%
22.48%
22.83%
28.52%
24.61%
23.80%
29.59%
30.05%
Other operating income
1.20%
1.43%
1.26%
3.96%
1.27%
1.82%
3.24%
2.10%
Administrative expenses
-5.48%
-5.49%
-6.43%
-6.78%
-5.72%
-5.73%
-6.86%
-7.11%
Selling and distribution
-4.11%
-4.17%
-3.50%
-4.17%
-4.59%
-4.61%
-4.94%
-5.04%
Other operating expenses
-0.66%
0.00%
-1.36%
-1.31%
-1.06%
-1.83%
-1.52%
-1.49%
Profit from operation, EBIT
19.06%
14.26%
12.81%
20.21%
14.51%
13.45%
19.51%
18.52%
Finance costs
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Share of profit from associate co.
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
EBT
19.06%
14.26%
12.81%
20.21%
14.51%
13.45%
19.51%
18.52%
Taxation
-4.65%
-3.42%
-2.68%
-4.75%
-2.58%
-1.87%
-3.60%
-3.94%
Net Income
14.40%
10.84%
10.13%
15.47%
11.93%
11.58%
15.92%
14.58%









Attributed to:








Equity holders of the company
14.40%
10.84%
10.13%
15.47%
11.93%
11.58%
15.92%
14.58%
Minority interest
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%

Table 3: Vertical Analysis of APOLLO


Year
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Revenue
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
Cost of sales and services
-79.36%
-77.06%
-75.31%
-75.76%
-72.58%
-75.02%
-66.71%
-63.48%
Gross profit
20.64%
22.94%
24.69%
24.24%
27.42%
24.98%
33.29%
36.52%
Other operating income
4.35%
2.61%
2.53%
1.31%
1.77%
1.96%
4.56%
3.34%
Administrative expenses
-6.09%
-4.26%
-4.88%
-5.03%
-6.08%
-3.79%
-5.84%
-6.63%
Selling and distribution
-8.20%
-9.99%
-9.29%
-9.93%
-9.32%
-10.09%
-11.12%
-10.15%
Other operating expenses
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Profit from operation, EBIT
10.69%
11.30%
13.06%
10.58%
13.79%
13.06%
20.89%
23.09%
Finance costs
-4.21%
-5.69%
-5.64%
-3.67%
-5.72%
-7.24%
-7.72%
-5.79%
Share of profit from associate co.
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.96%
1.48%
0.88%
-0.73%
0.01%
EBT
6.48%
5.61%
7.42%
7.87%
9.56%
6.70%
12.43%
17.30%
Taxation
-1.28%
-0.18%
-0.50%
0.21%
-0.27%
0.90%
-2.35%
-3.67%
Net Income
5.20%
5.43%
6.92%
8.09%
9.29%
7.60%
10.08%
13.63%









Attributed to:








Equity holders of the company
4.26%
4.38%
5.29%
6.76%
8.70%
7.60%
10.06%
13.18%
Minority interest
0.94%
1.05%
1.62%
1.33%
0.59%
0.00%
0.02%
0.45%
  
Table 4: Vertical Analysis of LONBISC

References:-

No comments:

Post a Comment